When Rush Limbaugh
discussed Georgetown law student, Sandra Fluke, and her testimony to House
Democrats supporting mandated insurance coverage for contraception, he chose to
label her based on her testimony a “slut” and a “prostitute.” Limbaugh’s word
choice infuriated feminists, lawmakers, medical professionals, and women who
noted that Fluke’s argument for contraception coverage included non-birth
control reasons and that, more importantly, women who do use contraception for
such purposes are not inherently sexually promiscuous, irresponsible, or
unentitled to their own sexuality.
This reaction to
Limbaugh’s controversial word choice also reignited the debate over reclaiming the word “slut” that was most popularized by the 2011 SlutWalk.
The SlutWalk, a response
to a Toronto police officer’s offhand comment that “women should avoid dressing
like sluts” in order to avoid rape, was a series of rallies worldwide in which
“reclaiming, or more accurately, reappropriating the word ‘slut’ is a
fundamental cornerstone of the movement.”
The SlutWalk created widespread debate among feminists about reclaiming the word “slut” for twentieth century feminism.
The question these
debates raise is, what should be reclaimed?
The word “queer” is an
example of a largely successful reclamation of a once derogatory word that
represented heternormative power structures. Its reclamation in the 1980s
resisted the oppressive, homophobic connotations by providing the LGBTQIA
community with a much-needed inclusive umbrella term for non-heterosexual and non-gender-binary individuals.
The challenge with
reclamation arises when a word has a varied significance across spheres because
when one group reclaims it and uses it as an empowering statement, it could
potentially reinforce the problematic hegemonies it represents in other groups.
For example, “cunt” is still popularly considered a derogatory term for women
and social attitudes toward female genitalia, yet some feminists like Eve
Ensler of The Vagina Monologues
have been trying to reappropriate the word since the 1970s. Forty years later,
the word and its power are still undecided upon.
When debating
reclamation, advocates need to ask themselves : what about the term or
phrase is being reappropriated and why? In the case of “slut,” what does
reusing the word do for feminism? Does it have the potential to inspire new
understandings of women’s sexuality? Or should there be a new word altogether
to signify this attitude? What is there to be achieved in reclaiming instead of
discarding any word for a social movement?
No comments:
Post a Comment